markquality.io

Carlyle Credit SolutionsCCS

CARLYLE CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC. · CIK 1702510 · as of 2026Q1

Size rank
#41 of 142
by investments at fair value
Investments at fair value
$2.9B
as reported, 2026Q1
Peer-held positions
162
also held by at least one other BDC
Comparable coverage
74.6%
share of fair value with usable peer marks
Peer universe
142 BDCs
compared in 2026Q1

Based on its 2026Q1 SEC filing, CARLYLE CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC. (CCS) carries $2.9B of investments at fair value. MarkQuality matched 162 of its positions (74.6% of the portfolio's fair value) to the same loans held by other BDCs in a universe of 142, so each of those marks can be lined up against the peer consensus. A free account shows the resulting Mark Discipline grade and how it has moved quarter over quarter.

Largest peer-held borrowers
as reported in the fund's SEC filing
Deerfield Dakota$90.5Mheld by 26 other BDCs
Cority Canada$44.2Mheld by 1 other BDC
Merative Commitment$41.3Mheld by 8 other BDCs
Infront Luxembourg Finance R L Luxembourg$40.3Mheld by 1 other BDC
Infra Svcs$37.2Mheld by 1 other BDC
Cliffwater$36.2Mheld by 10 other BDCs
Ellkay Pharmaceuticals$34.4Mheld by 1 other BDC
Iron Infinity Sub$34.3Mheld by 1 other BDC
How do the other holders mark these same names? Free with an account
Mark Discipline grade — free account required

See how consistently Carlyle Credit Solutions marks its comparable book against the cross-BDC peer consensus, with position-level evidence and quarter-over-quarter history.

Create free account
Reported fair value by quarter
2022Q4 — 2026Q1 · 13 quarters filed
$1.9B$2.7B$3.5B2022Q4: $3.6B · 96 peer-held positions2022Q42023Q1: $1.9B · 117 peer-held positions2023Q2: $1.8B · 116 peer-held positions2023Q3: $1.8B · 112 peer-held positions2023Q32023Q4: $1.7B · 113 peer-held positions2024Q1: $1.7B · 116 peer-held positions2024Q2: $1.6B · 90 peer-held positions2024Q22024Q3: $1.6B · 120 peer-held positions2024Q4: $1.8B · 127 peer-held positions2025Q1: $1.8B · 135 peer-held positions2025Q12025Q2: $2.1B · 135 peer-held positions2025Q3: $2.3B · 143 peer-held positions2026Q1: $2.9B · 162 peer-held positions2026Q1$2.9B

The Mark Discipline scorecard tracks how this fund's marks sat against the peer consensus across these same quarters — free with an account.

What the scorecard looks like

Illustrative preview with anonymized data — your account shows the real thing.

Open it free
Mark Discipline scorecard preview (anonymized sample data)
Other large BDCs in the peer universe

Frequently asked questions

Where does this data come from?
Every figure is derived from public SEC filings — BDC quarterly reports and related datasets published on SEC EDGAR. Nothing comes from paid pricing feeds or private sources, and every number can be traced back to the filing it appeared in.
What is the peer consensus?
When two or more BDCs hold the same loan, each reports its own fair-value mark in its own SEC filing. MarkQuality lines those marks up: the median of the other holders' marks is the peer consensus for that position.
Is this a rating or an opinion on the fund?
No. MarkQuality does not issue fair-value opinions and does not claim any mark is wrong or any NAV is overstated. It measures how consistently a fund's marks track the peer consensus — a difference can reflect legitimate factors like position size, timing, lot, structure, or valuation methodology. It is analytics on public data, not investment advice.
What do I get with a free account?
The full Mark Discipline scorecard for every tracked BDC — position-level comparisons against peer marks, quarter-over-quarter history, a change feed, and watchlist alerts. Free during the beta, no card required.
How often is the data updated?
Quarterly, following the SEC filing cycle: after each reporting season the newly filed marks are ingested, re-clustered, and the peer comparisons recomputed.
How the comparison worksSEC EDGAR filings
Every figure on this page is the fund's own number as reported in its public SEC filings. MarkQuality compares each BDC's marks with the cross-BDC consensus on the same loans; only marks the pipeline rates usable feed the peer medians. The comparison measures how consistently a BDC's marks track the peer consensus — it is not a judgment of the accuracy or good faith of any fund's valuations. Verify every figure against its source filing. Independent comparison on public data, not investment advice.

Every mark referenced on MarkQuality is the holder's own figure as reported in its SEC filing, shown side by side against the peer median — not a fair-value opinion, nor an assertion that any mark is wrong or that net asset value is overstated. A gap from the median can reflect legitimate differences in position, timing, lot, structure, or valuation methodology rather than mispricing. Informational only — not investment advice.