markquality.io

Goldman Sachs Private Middle Market CrGSPMM

GOLDMAN SACHS PRIVATE MIDDLE MARKET CREDIT II LLC · CIK 1772704 · as of 2026Q1

Size rank
#76 of 142
by investments at fair value
Investments at fair value
$1.2B
as reported, 2026Q1
Peer-held positions
58
also held by at least one other BDC
Comparable coverage
76.4%
share of fair value with usable peer marks
Peer universe
142 BDCs
compared in 2026Q1

Based on its 2026Q1 SEC filing, GOLDMAN SACHS PRIVATE MIDDLE MARKET CREDIT II LLC (GSPMM) carries $1.2B of investments at fair value. MarkQuality matched 58 of its positions (76.4% of the portfolio's fair value) to the same loans held by other BDCs in a universe of 142, so each of those marks can be lined up against the peer consensus. A free account shows the resulting Mark Discipline grade and how it has moved quarter over quarter.

Largest peer-held borrowers
as reported in the fund's SEC filing
Zarya Eptura$79.3Mheld by 5 other BDCs
Heartland Home$60.7Mheld by 6 other BDCs
Sundance Group$50.4Mheld by 6 other BDCs
Bsi3 Menu Kydia$47.5Mheld by 2 other BDCs
Diligent Commitment$44.4Mheld by 25 other BDCs
Eso Solutions$36.0Mheld by 3 other BDCs
Lone Wolf$31.5Mheld by 1 other BDC
Vital Records$28.6Mheld by 8 other BDCs
How do the other holders mark these same names? Free with an account
Mark Discipline grade — free account required

See how consistently Goldman Sachs Private Middle Market Cr marks its comparable book against the cross-BDC peer consensus, with position-level evidence and quarter-over-quarter history.

Create free account
Reported fair value by quarter
2022Q4 — 2026Q1 · 12 quarters filed
$730.2M$1.6B$2.5B2022Q4: $388.7M · 5 peer-held positions2022Q42023Q3: $2.5B · 135 peer-held positions2023Q4: $2.1B · 121 peer-held positions2024Q1: $2.1B · 123 peer-held positions2024Q12024Q2: $2.1B · 114 peer-held positions2024Q3: $1.9B · 111 peer-held positions2024Q4: $1.9B · 103 peer-held positions2024Q42025Q1: $1.7B · 92 peer-held positions2025Q2: $1.5B · 80 peer-held positions2025Q3: $1.5B · 76 peer-held positions2025Q32025Q4: $1.3B · 69 peer-held positions2026Q1: $1.2B · 58 peer-held positions2026Q1$1.2B

The Mark Discipline scorecard tracks how this fund's marks sat against the peer consensus across these same quarters — free with an account.

What the scorecard looks like

Illustrative preview with anonymized data — your account shows the real thing.

Open it free
Mark Discipline scorecard preview (anonymized sample data)
Other large BDCs in the peer universe

Frequently asked questions

Where does this data come from?
Every figure is derived from public SEC filings — BDC quarterly reports and related datasets published on SEC EDGAR. Nothing comes from paid pricing feeds or private sources, and every number can be traced back to the filing it appeared in.
What is the peer consensus?
When two or more BDCs hold the same loan, each reports its own fair-value mark in its own SEC filing. MarkQuality lines those marks up: the median of the other holders' marks is the peer consensus for that position.
Is this a rating or an opinion on the fund?
No. MarkQuality does not issue fair-value opinions and does not claim any mark is wrong or any NAV is overstated. It measures how consistently a fund's marks track the peer consensus — a difference can reflect legitimate factors like position size, timing, lot, structure, or valuation methodology. It is analytics on public data, not investment advice.
What do I get with a free account?
The full Mark Discipline scorecard for every tracked BDC — position-level comparisons against peer marks, quarter-over-quarter history, a change feed, and watchlist alerts. Free during the beta, no card required.
How often is the data updated?
Quarterly, following the SEC filing cycle: after each reporting season the newly filed marks are ingested, re-clustered, and the peer comparisons recomputed.
How the comparison worksSEC EDGAR filings
Every figure on this page is the fund's own number as reported in its public SEC filings. MarkQuality compares each BDC's marks with the cross-BDC consensus on the same loans; only marks the pipeline rates usable feed the peer medians. The comparison measures how consistently a BDC's marks track the peer consensus — it is not a judgment of the accuracy or good faith of any fund's valuations. Verify every figure against its source filing. Independent comparison on public data, not investment advice.

Every mark referenced on MarkQuality is the holder's own figure as reported in its SEC filing, shown side by side against the peer median — not a fair-value opinion, nor an assertion that any mark is wrong or that net asset value is overstated. A gap from the median can reflect legitimate differences in position, timing, lot, structure, or valuation methodology rather than mispricing. Informational only — not investment advice.