Stone Point Credit Income FundSPCIF
STONE POINT CREDIT INCOME FUND · CIK 2031283 · as of 2026Q1
Based on its 2026Q1 SEC filing, STONE POINT CREDIT INCOME FUND (SPCIF) carries $716.5M of investments at fair value. MarkQuality matched 109 of its positions (84.4% of the portfolio's fair value) to the same loans held by other BDCs in a universe of 142, so each of those marks can be lined up against the peer consensus. A free account shows the resulting Mark Discipline grade and how it has moved quarter over quarter.
| Wharf Street Ratings | $22.3M | 1 position | held by 4 other BDCs |
| Orion Q | $20.7M | 4 positions | held by 2 other BDCs |
| Babylon | $17.8M | 1 position | held by 1 other BDC |
| Accordion Partners | $16.3M | 1 position | held by 10 other BDCs |
| Fetch Insurance | $14.6M | 1 position | held by 7 other BDCs |
| Minotaur B | $13.8M | 1 position | held by 10 other BDCs |
| Flow Traders | $13.4M | 1 position | held by 6 other BDCs |
| Action Behavior Centers Therapy | $13.4M | 2 positions | held by 3 other BDCs |
See how consistently Stone Point Credit Income Fund marks its comparable book against the cross-BDC peer consensus, with position-level evidence and quarter-over-quarter history.
The Mark Discipline scorecard tracks how this fund's marks sat against the peer consensus across these same quarters — free with an account.
Illustrative preview with anonymized data — your account shows the real thing.
Frequently asked questions
- Where does this data come from?
- Every figure is derived from public SEC filings — BDC quarterly reports and related datasets published on SEC EDGAR. Nothing comes from paid pricing feeds or private sources, and every number can be traced back to the filing it appeared in.
- What is the peer consensus?
- When two or more BDCs hold the same loan, each reports its own fair-value mark in its own SEC filing. MarkQuality lines those marks up: the median of the other holders' marks is the peer consensus for that position.
- Is this a rating or an opinion on the fund?
- No. MarkQuality does not issue fair-value opinions and does not claim any mark is wrong or any NAV is overstated. It measures how consistently a fund's marks track the peer consensus — a difference can reflect legitimate factors like position size, timing, lot, structure, or valuation methodology. It is analytics on public data, not investment advice.
- What do I get with a free account?
- The full Mark Discipline scorecard for every tracked BDC — position-level comparisons against peer marks, quarter-over-quarter history, a change feed, and watchlist alerts. Free during the beta, no card required.
- How often is the data updated?
- Quarterly, following the SEC filing cycle: after each reporting season the newly filed marks are ingested, re-clustered, and the peer comparisons recomputed.
Every mark referenced on MarkQuality is the holder's own figure as reported in its SEC filing, shown side by side against the peer median — not a fair-value opinion, nor an assertion that any mark is wrong or that net asset value is overstated. A gap from the median can reflect legitimate differences in position, timing, lot, structure, or valuation methodology rather than mispricing. Informational only — not investment advice.