markquality.io

T Rowe Price Oha Select Private CreditTRPOS

T. ROWE PRICE OHA SELECT PRIVATE CREDIT FUND · CIK 1901164 · as of 2026Q1

Size rank
#40 of 142
by investments at fair value
Investments at fair value
$3.0B
as reported, 2026Q1
Peer-held positions
86
also held by at least one other BDC
Comparable coverage
45.6%
share of fair value with usable peer marks
Peer universe
142 BDCs
compared in 2026Q1

Based on its 2026Q1 SEC filing, T. ROWE PRICE OHA SELECT PRIVATE CREDIT FUND (TRPOS) carries $3.0B of investments at fair value. MarkQuality matched 86 of its positions (45.6% of the portfolio's fair value) to the same loans held by other BDCs in a universe of 142, so each of those marks can be lined up against the peer consensus. A free account shows the resulting Mark Discipline grade and how it has moved quarter over quarter.

Largest peer-held borrowers
as reported in the fund's SEC filing
Aurelia Netherlands$62.8Mheld by 4 other BDCs
Shelf Out$58.1Mheld by 1 other BDC
Ncws$57.7Mheld by 1 other BDC
Polaris$51.3Mheld by 3 other BDCs
Wheels$50.0Mheld by 1 other BDC
Fleetpride$46.2Mheld by 1 other BDC
Insurance Majesco$45.0Mheld by 9 other BDCs
Iri Group$43.8Mheld by 1 other BDC
How do the other holders mark these same names? Free with an account
Mark Discipline grade — free account required

See how consistently T Rowe Price Oha Select Private Credit marks its comparable book against the cross-BDC peer consensus, with position-level evidence and quarter-over-quarter history.

Create free account
Reported fair value by quarter
2023Q3 — 2026Q1 · 10 quarters filed
$1.3B$2.1B$2.9B2023Q3: $922.2M · 75 peer-held positions2023Q32024Q1: $1.3B · 66 peer-held positions2024Q2: $1.6B · 103 peer-held positions2024Q3: $1.9B · 108 peer-held positions2024Q32024Q4: $2.1B · 115 peer-held positions2025Q1: $2.2B · 118 peer-held positions2025Q2: $2.5B · 95 peer-held positions2025Q22025Q3: $2.7B · 106 peer-held positions2025Q4: $2.9B · 155 peer-held positions2026Q1: $3.0B · 86 peer-held positions2026Q1$3.0B

The Mark Discipline scorecard tracks how this fund's marks sat against the peer consensus across these same quarters — free with an account.

What the scorecard looks like

Illustrative preview with anonymized data — your account shows the real thing.

Open it free
Mark Discipline scorecard preview (anonymized sample data)
Other large BDCs in the peer universe

Frequently asked questions

Where does this data come from?
Every figure is derived from public SEC filings — BDC quarterly reports and related datasets published on SEC EDGAR. Nothing comes from paid pricing feeds or private sources, and every number can be traced back to the filing it appeared in.
What is the peer consensus?
When two or more BDCs hold the same loan, each reports its own fair-value mark in its own SEC filing. MarkQuality lines those marks up: the median of the other holders' marks is the peer consensus for that position.
Is this a rating or an opinion on the fund?
No. MarkQuality does not issue fair-value opinions and does not claim any mark is wrong or any NAV is overstated. It measures how consistently a fund's marks track the peer consensus — a difference can reflect legitimate factors like position size, timing, lot, structure, or valuation methodology. It is analytics on public data, not investment advice.
What do I get with a free account?
The full Mark Discipline scorecard for every tracked BDC — position-level comparisons against peer marks, quarter-over-quarter history, a change feed, and watchlist alerts. Free during the beta, no card required.
How often is the data updated?
Quarterly, following the SEC filing cycle: after each reporting season the newly filed marks are ingested, re-clustered, and the peer comparisons recomputed.
How the comparison worksSEC EDGAR filings
Every figure on this page is the fund's own number as reported in its public SEC filings. MarkQuality compares each BDC's marks with the cross-BDC consensus on the same loans; only marks the pipeline rates usable feed the peer medians. The comparison measures how consistently a BDC's marks track the peer consensus — it is not a judgment of the accuracy or good faith of any fund's valuations. Verify every figure against its source filing. Independent comparison on public data, not investment advice.

Every mark referenced on MarkQuality is the holder's own figure as reported in its SEC filing, shown side by side against the peer median — not a fair-value opinion, nor an assertion that any mark is wrong or that net asset value is overstated. A gap from the median can reflect legitimate differences in position, timing, lot, structure, or valuation methodology rather than mispricing. Informational only — not investment advice.