markquality.io

Tpg Twin Brook Capital Income FundTTBCI

TPG TWIN BROOK CAPITAL INCOME FUND · CIK 1913724 · as of 2026Q1

Size rank
#27 of 142
by investments at fair value
Investments at fair value
$4.4B
as reported, 2026Q1
Peer-held positions
28
also held by at least one other BDC
Comparable coverage
12.0%
share of fair value with usable peer marks
Peer universe
142 BDCs
compared in 2026Q1

TPG TWIN BROOK CAPITAL INCOME FUND (TTBCI, CIK 1913724) reported $4.4B of investments at fair value in its 2026Q1 SEC filing. 28 of those positions (12.0% of the portfolio's fair value) are also held by at least one of the other BDCs MarkQuality tracks — enough overlap to line its marks up against the cross-BDC peer consensus, position by position. The full Mark Discipline scorecard, including the grade and quarter-over-quarter history, is free with an account.

Largest peer-held borrowers
as reported in the fund's SEC filing
Cap Ksi$59.8Mheld by 1 other BDC
Hec Purchaser$55.5Mheld by 3 other BDCs
Cns Purchaser$41.8Mheld by 1 other BDC
Asp Global$39.9Mheld by 1 other BDC
Sun Orchard$34.2Mheld by 1 other BDC
Ussc$33.9Mheld by 1 other BDC
Renovation Systems$32.1Mheld by 1 other BDC
Ironhorse Purchaser$29.1Mheld by 4 other BDCs
How do the other holders mark these same names? Free with an account
Mark Discipline grade — free account required

See how consistently Tpg Twin Brook Capital Income Fund marks its comparable book against the cross-BDC peer consensus, with position-level evidence and quarter-over-quarter history.

Create free account
Reported fair value by quarter
2023Q1 — 2026Q1 · 13 quarters filed
$1.4B$2.9B$4.3B2023Q1: $851.3M · 30 peer-held positions2023Q12023Q2: $945.8M · 2 peer-held positions2023Q3: $1.2B · 14 peer-held positions2023Q4: $1.3B · 24 peer-held positions2023Q42024Q1: $1.8B · 29 peer-held positions2024Q2: $2.3B · 27 peer-held positions2024Q3: $2.7B · 33 peer-held positions2024Q32024Q4: $3.1B · 34 peer-held positions2025Q1: $3.3B · 34 peer-held positions2025Q2: $3.5B · 42 peer-held positions2025Q22025Q3: $3.8B · 40 peer-held positions2025Q4: $4.2B · 38 peer-held positions2026Q1: $4.4B · 28 peer-held positions2026Q1$4.4B

The Mark Discipline scorecard tracks how this fund's marks sat against the peer consensus across these same quarters — free with an account.

What the scorecard looks like

Illustrative preview with anonymized data — your account shows the real thing.

Open it free
Mark Discipline scorecard preview (anonymized sample data)
Other large BDCs in the peer universe

Frequently asked questions

Where does this data come from?
Every figure is derived from public SEC filings — BDC quarterly reports and related datasets published on SEC EDGAR. Nothing comes from paid pricing feeds or private sources, and every number can be traced back to the filing it appeared in.
What is the peer consensus?
When two or more BDCs hold the same loan, each reports its own fair-value mark in its own SEC filing. MarkQuality lines those marks up: the median of the other holders' marks is the peer consensus for that position.
Is this a rating or an opinion on the fund?
No. MarkQuality does not issue fair-value opinions and does not claim any mark is wrong or any NAV is overstated. It measures how consistently a fund's marks track the peer consensus — a difference can reflect legitimate factors like position size, timing, lot, structure, or valuation methodology. It is analytics on public data, not investment advice.
What do I get with a free account?
The full Mark Discipline scorecard for every tracked BDC — position-level comparisons against peer marks, quarter-over-quarter history, a change feed, and watchlist alerts. Free during the beta, no card required.
How often is the data updated?
Quarterly, following the SEC filing cycle: after each reporting season the newly filed marks are ingested, re-clustered, and the peer comparisons recomputed.
How the comparison worksSEC EDGAR filings
Every figure on this page is the fund's own number as reported in its public SEC filings. MarkQuality compares each BDC's marks with the cross-BDC consensus on the same loans; only marks the pipeline rates usable feed the peer medians. The comparison measures how consistently a BDC's marks track the peer consensus — it is not a judgment of the accuracy or good faith of any fund's valuations. Verify every figure against its source filing. Independent comparison on public data, not investment advice.

Every mark referenced on MarkQuality is the holder's own figure as reported in its SEC filing, shown side by side against the peer median — not a fair-value opinion, nor an assertion that any mark is wrong or that net asset value is overstated. A gap from the median can reflect legitimate differences in position, timing, lot, structure, or valuation methodology rather than mispricing. Informational only — not investment advice.